Tegrity.AITEGRITY.AI / RESEARCH-CONTRIBUTIONS · v1.0
Research Contributions and Technical Exchanges
Tegrity.AI develops applied research, illustrated here through examples of contribution to universities, European research institutions, United Nations bodies and ITU technical groups.
Contents
§ 01
Selected examples of research contribution
Each example is connected to the research lines and deployed-systems retrospectives from which it was developed.
01Universitat de València — QAVA, Quantum Algorithms and Applications (GIUV2026-019)
Examples of contribution shared with QAVA across quantum computing, optimization and economics: Regime Awareness and the Early Warning System architecture; xSeil and Phylons cases for potential quantum and quantum-inspired advantage in search, routing, orchestration, semantic windows and cascade analysis.
Based on: Regime Awareness in Adaptive Systems · Regime Awareness Capability: Field Case · xSeil deployed-systems research · xSeil functional-efficiency analysis · Phylons: Predictive Factors to Semantic Windows · Phylons: Dynamic Combinatorial Search · xSeil quantum research boundary
02TalTech — Information Systems Group; Next Gen Digital Society Research Group; UNESCO Chair in Digital Transformation for Inclusive and Sustainable Development
The Cost of Clarity / The Minimal Information a Transformation Needs is the subject of an RUP proposal submitted to Enterprise Estonia / EIS (reference 943697), with TalTech supporting the proposed research programme. The proposed work addresses the minimum information required before transformation, the cost of producing missing information, tacit and undeclared information, cascading transformation risk, and retrospective and prospective validation.
Based on: The Cost of Clarity · The Minimal Information a Transformation Needs · Human Intelligence Debt · Architectural Entropy / Human Intelligence Debt · Informational Friction · What Goes Unpriced Is Paid in Human Intelligence
03UNECE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (WP.5) — 39th session, agenda item 7
From Historical Mobility Orchestration to Minimum Sufficient Control. A two-page example of contribution, built from the 2016–2017 Riviera Maya mobility case, developing three lines of analysis: network externalities from bounded fleet coordination; cascading commitments and criticality thresholds; and transparent Pareto-based scenario planning before operational commitment.
Read the contribution document (DOCX)
Based on: Regime Awareness in Adaptive Systems · Regime Awareness Capability: Field Case · AI Operational Integrity Architecture · xSeil: Vehicle Routing Under Fully Committed Demand · xSeil: Large Problems Without Large Hardware
04UNECE WP.6 — Education on Standardization Initiative
An example of contribution on standards as accumulated good practice for initiatives outside formal standardization channels, especially AI-era community education in rural, Indigenous and low-resource contexts. Formación Integral 2.0 / 3.0 provides the applied case, including AI-supported master–apprentice transmission of tacit and ancestral knowledge and the Totonacapan–Gambia cross-cultural research direction.
Participation in online and Geneva sessions since 2025.
Based on: Human Intelligence Debt · AI Integrity Management · The Limits of AI Oversight · What Goes Unpriced Is Paid in Human Intelligence
Shared as a worked example with Lance Thompson (UN, Education on Standardization Initiative) on 7 September 2026: the Formación Integral 3.0 / IGF 2026 master document, illustrating standards-as-good-practice adoption outside formal education and standardization channels.
05European Commission — Joint Research Centre
Example of contribution (ID 7781f158-c97f-4444-8341-9641934a3e32): AI-assisted Data Collection and Process Mining Analysis of Administrative Acts Linked to Local Public Investments. The contribution introduced an information-quality and readiness layer before process mining: documented, tacit and institutionally undeclared information; contradictions requiring authoritative resolution; human-owned ontology; provenance and traceability; structured/unstructured evidence tracks; and quality boundaries established before scaling extraction.
Based on: The Cost of Clarity · The Minimal Information a Transformation Needs · Informational Friction · Human Intelligence Debt · Three Ways a Fact Can Go Missing
§ 02
UN Data Governance & Policy — Examples of Contribution
01UN CSTD — Working Group on Data Governance at All Levels
Information Outside the Readiness Sampling Frame. A practitioner example of contribution, on information that conventional readiness assessments can miss: tacit/distributed knowledge and institutionally undeclared information. It introduced measures for tacit/distributed share, declarative burden, retrieval friction and persistent human mediation, linking data governance and AI readiness to the information conditions that exist before large-scale transformation.
Read the contribution document (PDF)
Based on: The Cost of Clarity · Human Intelligence Debt · Informational Friction · Three Ways a Fact Can Go Missing · Working Group
02ITU-T Focus Group on AI for Smart Sustainable Cities
FGAI4SSC-I-097 — Minimum Sufficient Control as an Architectural Property of AI-enabled Urban Systems. This example of contribution frames control as a sufficiency problem: the coordinated intervention required to keep declared system outcomes within an acceptable objective envelope while accounting for externalities, cascades, dependencies, finite sensing and bounded operational capacity.
Read the contribution document (PDF)
Based on: AI Operational Integrity Architecture · Regime Awareness in Adaptive Systems · The Limits of AI Oversight · xSeil deployed-systems research · Phylons: Dynamic Combinatorial Search · Focus Group
03ITU-T FG-TIDA — Ecosystem Awareness
A public working example of contribution centred on Theme #13, with cross-theme interfaces to Themes #6, #16 and #21. Ecosystem Awareness develops system-level reasoning around local operational closure, determinacy, inherited indeterminacy, bounded human/system capacity and handoff between independently governed components. The systemic-capacity / handoff interface has been discussed as a possible foundational architectural building block for system-level reasoning.
Based on: Informational Friction · AI Operational Integrity Architecture · The Limits of AI Oversight · Regime Awareness in Adaptive Systems · Regime Awareness Roadmap · Phylons: Predictive Factors to Semantic Windows · Phylons: Revision-Aware Event Semantics and Relabeling Cascades · Theme #13 (contributor @dakleyer) · Selected discussion (contributor @dakleyer) · Theme #16 working-package proposal (contributor @dakleyer)
Contributed under GitHub handle @dakleyer · Official repository: github.com/FG-TIDA/themes (contributor @dakleyer)
§ 03
Selected technical exchanges
01European Commission JRC / DigComp
Technical exchange on how to distinguish human competence from capability supplied by AI when both contribute to an output. The response from the DigComp team sharpened the Formación Integral 3.0 challenge model around observable human competence, transparency and accountability in AI-supported work.
Based on: Human Intelligence Debt · AI Integrity Management · The Limits of AI Oversight
02Europeana Foundation
Formación Integral 3.0 case exchange on tacit knowledge, AI-assisted representation and cultural-heritage reuse. Europeana’s training and data-governance specialists raised concrete questions around hallucinations, learner relevance, pacing, craftsmanship evaluation and the governance layer required when knowledge is represented and reused through AI.
Based on: AI Integrity Management · Human Intelligence Debt · The Limits of AI Oversight
§ 04
Examples of contribution in development
01Internet Governance Forum 2026 / IG Labs — Formación Integral 3.0In development
Submission in development around AI, master–apprentice learning, tacit and ancestral knowledge, trusted practitioner roles, portable context and bounded human–AI challenges, with a Totonacapan–Gambia cross-cultural research direction.
Based on: Human Intelligence Debt · AI Integrity Management · The Limits of AI Oversight
02NIST AI TEVV Zero DraftIn development
Two-page example of contribution in development around three dimensions of indeterminacy in AI evaluation: uncertainty within the evaluator’s available window; residual decision-relevant state outside that window; and information loss when bounded results are compressed and reused across an ecosystem. Draft 0: 16 September 2026.
Based on: Informational Friction · AI Operational Integrity Architecture · The Limits of AI Oversight · Regime Awareness in Adaptive Systems · AI Integrity Management
03Linux Foundation — AGNTCY (Internet of Agents)Roadmap
A forward-looking connection under Ecosystem Awareness: AGNTCY builds open, cross-vendor interoperability infrastructure — discovery, identity, secure communication and handoff — for AI agents built and operated by independently governed organizations. That is precisely the handoff-between-independently-governed-components problem Ecosystem Awareness frames architecturally; as multi-vendor agent ecosystems grow, the bounded-capacity and inherited-indeterminacy questions it raises become directly relevant to how that interoperability layer is designed.
Based on: Ecosystem Awareness — Theme #13 (contributor @dakleyer) · Informational Friction · AI Operational Integrity Architecture · agntcy.org
§ 05
Institutional documents
Public governance and activity records supporting this research programme.
01The Integral Management Society — public statutes
Mission copy accompanied by the Foundation Act notarial record and Hague Apostille no. 019239.
02Tegrity.AI — official Charter
Constitutive charter and operating principles of the initiative.
03Tegrity.AI — Activity Report and Research Portfolio 2026
Full institutional report of The Integral Management Society.
